HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Melis, R. J. F. Articles by Rikkert, M. G. M. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Melis, R. J. F. Articles by Rikkert, M. G. M. O.

Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment: Back to the Future A Randomized Study of a Multidisciplinary Program to Intervene on Geriatric Syndromes in Vulnerable Older People Who Live at Home (Dutch EASYcare Study)

¹ Department of Geriatric Medicine, ² Centre for Quality of Care Research,³ Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Technology Assessment, and ⁴ Department of General Practice, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
⁵ Sheffield Institutes for Studies on Ageing, Barnsley District General Hospital, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Address correspondence to René J. F. Melis, MD, PhD, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Geriatric Medicine 925, PO Box 9101, NL, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. E-mail: r.melis{at}ger.umcn.nl

Background. The effectiveness of community-based geriatric intervention models for vulnerable older adults is controversial. We evaluated a problem-based multidisciplinary intervention targeting vulnerable older adults at home that promised efficacy through better timing and increased commitment of patients and primary care physicians. This study compared the effects of this new model to usual care.

Methods. Primary care physicians referred older people for problems with cognition, nutrition, behavior, mood, or mobility. One hundred fifty-one participants (mean age 82.2 years, 74.8% women) were included in a pseudocluster randomized trial with 6-month follow-up for the primary outcomes. Eighty-five participants received the new intervention, and 66 usual care. In the intervention arm, geriatric nurses visited patients at home for geriatric assessment and management in cooperation with primary care physicians and geriatricians. Modified intention-to-treat analyses focused on differences between treatment arms in functional abilities (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale-3) and mental well-being (subscale mental health Medical Outcomes Study [MOS]-20), using a mixed linear model.

Results. After 3 months, treatment arms showed significant differences in favor of the new intervention. Functional abilities improved 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–4.2) and well-being 5.8 points (95% CI, 0.1–11.4). After 6 months, the favorable effect increased for well-being (9.1; 95% CI, 2.4–15.9), but the effect on functional abilities was no longer significant (1.6; 95% CI, –0.7 to 3.9).

Conclusions. This problem-based geriatric intervention improved functional abilities and mental well-being of vulnerable older people. Problem-based interventions can increase the effectiveness of primary care for this population.

Key Words: Primary health care • Frailty • Health services research • Multidimensional geriatric assessment • Health services for the aged

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Huss, A. E. Stuck, L. Z. Rubenstein, M. Egger, and K. M. Clough-Gorr Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment: Back to the Future Multidimensional Preventive Home Visit Programs for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., March 1, 2008; 63(3): 298 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]